4 Things Microsoft Could Learn From Steve Jobs

What words come to mind when asked to describe Microsoft today? Cool, stylish, revolutionary, and innovative are probably out of the question. However, those words could easily be used to describe Apple. So maybe the brains at Microsoft could learn a thing or two from one of the few brilliant CEOs of our times, who just so happens to be the leader behind Apple’s success — Steve Jobs.
Problem #1: Designers, Designers, Designers!
Let’s be real: Microsoft’s products aren’t particularly well-known for their design — they simply aren’t on par with their competition’s offerings. Sure, there was a time when layering in every possible option, button, gizmo, menu bar, and whatnot was all the rage, but those times are long gone. People are looking for something different. That difference is in the design.
People are now willing to pay a huge premium for a well-designed product, and Apple’s fan base (and sales numbers) is living proof of that. But Microsoft hasn’t caught on to this trend. The company has fallen so far behind the times that it has to make one question if Microsoft has had any feasible concept of what design is for most of the past decade.
Furthermore, Microsoft’s focus on developers (developers, developers!) has always been a priority for the company, but computers and software programs are no longer unbelievably complex or used by only the geekiest among us all. It’s now expected that younger (and, in many cases, older) people are computer literate. These people want product designs that are suited towards meeting their needs and getting the job done.
Lesson From Steve
Steve Jobs realized that there is a certain group of people who prefer practicality and beauty over functionality. It might come off as a bit dictatorial, but today’s consumers are increasingly willing to forgo the comfort of control, openness, and customization for an overall improved experience. Apple’s designers have changed the expectations and quality in product design, and Microsoft would be wise to explore these trends — especially if they intend on remaining competitive in the eyes of consumers for the long term.
Problem #2: Lack of Focus
Microsoft has a tendency to create many experiments, products, and concepts, but how many of those turn into successful and profitable endeavors? Very few, just like the Kin, the Courier, and the Zune.
Sure, these projects and experiments are interesting — and it is fun to envision the future of technology — but these pet projects are doing little, if anything, for consumers today. More importantly, it’s a drain on the company’s resources and bottom line. If it isn’t generating consumer interest or revenue, what is the point?
Admittedly, Microsoft has plenty of cash to burn, but this money should be considered as a finite resource, especially for a company that is being dominated by its competition in the consumer marketplace. It also doesn’t help that Microsoft’s revenues have suffered lately from the declining economy.
Lesson From Steve
Steve Jobs doesn’t mess around with crazy experiments and unprofitable endeavors. He ensures that his company’s resources are directed towards improving profitable products and creating new products that result in interest from consumers and, most importantly, generate revenues. As iTunes, Mac OS X, Apple TV, iPod Touch, App Store, and iPhone have revolutionized their respective industries, Microsoft has little to brag beyond its impressive operating system share. So it’s time for Microsoft to knuckle down.
Problem #3: Product Disparity
Another serious issue for Microsoft is that a majority of their products have little connection to each other. This is particularly true with their Internet-based products. Xbox Live, Zune Marketplace, Hotmail, Bing, MSN, and Skydrive are all great products in their own right, but it requires too much of an effort for a user to take advantage of these services with ease.
If you look at larger companies like Apple or Google or smaller companies like Zoho and Facebook, their products have something in common: they tend to work well together, if not seamlessly. They offer a universal experience that helps keep the user interested in all of the company’s various products and services. But Microsoft hasn’t managed to accomplish this, and until the they do, I fear that consumers will continue to leave Microsoft’s products for alternatives that are offered in a more convenient and unified offering.
Lesson From Steve
Jobs has created a single developer and content platform that holds the core of the Apple’s entire future — it is iTunes. He has been executing a strategy to integrate all of Apple’s products into a single platform that is rich with content. It is, in a word, genius (now we know why Mac OS X hasn’t received much love lately and might eventually be phased out). Digital content distribution is the future, and iTunes is in the best position to handle that task. Microsoft doesn’t need to take it as far as Steve Jobs has taken it with iTunes, but there is certainly an impressive lesson here that could be exploited in the future: a single, unified marketplace that combines desktop, mobile, and Web-based products could be huge hit.
Problem #4: Company Image
Finally, brand loyalty is a big part of consumer behavior nowadays. Every company has their loyalists (i.e. fanboys and fangirls), and these people are an integral part of spreading the word about products and services. However, if you asked any tech-savvy teenager or twenty-something to give an example of an impressive technology company, you would be hard pressed to see Microsoft’s name mentioned.
It’s all a perception, and few companies have managed to create an amazing perception of themselves. Apple is cool. Google is cool. Sony is cool. Others, however, haven’t managed to handle their public image: Microsoft is not cool.
Think about it: who actually walks into a store with the sole intention of buying a Microsoft product?
Lesson From Steve
If Steve Jobs has done anything right above all else, creating an impressive image for Apple and himself is it. But Jobs didn’t accomplish this with any one single action: he put in years of effort and consistency to create a company that most can only dream about. Decade-long efforts have constantly produced household-name products year after year, and this is probably the most important lesson that Microsoft could learn from Jobs.
I am a mac user, i own an imac, a macbook pro, an iphone and an ipad, and I develop software based on microsoft platforms, and I still think you’re a dumbass. The developers, developers, developers quote was from a dev conference targeted at developers – it has nothing to do with the target market of their non-dev related products. People like you should not even be allowed near a keyboard – just completely ill informed and not even clever enough to disguise it and consequently misinforming the already ignorant.
One more thing Steve Jobs could learn from MS…
Let your operating system run on other computer systems than just your own proprietary hardware.
Microsoft can run on a Mac, but Mac OS X can’t run on a normal PC without some work and cracking…
And FWIW I’m not bashing Microsoft, I think they have a lot to offer but Ballmer is not doing them any good at all. Wasting $1Billion on 500 Kin phones should have got him kicked out already. Win Phone 7 certainly looks interesting and it’s good to see them taking a new approach unlike others who have blatantly copied Apple’s approach.
@Pete K
Some points:
OS X has a show desktop option through “expose”, you can assign a shortcut, mouse button, gesture or screen corner to it. I use this all the time.
Gates left MS a decade ago so I don’t know why you refer to him as the company. Also it should be noted their stock has flatlined since Ballmer took over, Microsoft have been riding on Windows and Office (their primary earners) for the past decade with little innovation coming from Redmond.
Apple don’t support blue ray or flash because they’re stopgap technology. Apple are clearly investing in the longterm tech; digital distribution.
You think win7 looks good? Oh well, each to their own I suppose.
The iPhone screen is by far the best on the market, no other phone comes close to the clarity and sharpness it displays. Bigger dimensions != better. The device itself is also outstanding, it takes the highest quality photos I’ve seen on a smartphone yet because the optics and sensor were Apple’s primary focus, not just upping the megapixels like other phone makers. It has full HD video editing, a gyro you can’t deny isn’t brilliant, a massive choice of quality apps unavailable elsewhere, very good battery life (it blows the Evo out of the water), an exceptionally well designed interface and an outstanding design to name just a few. The antenna issue is present in all phones (many tell you not to hold them a certain way in the manual) and can be avoided, even so, less than 1% of the already 3 million + owners actually report a problem.
Yesterday apple reported record profits and growth once again, they’re not failing any time soon, they’ve only just got started. They’ve been innovating since before Microsoft and others were even relevant (don’t forget Apple were the first to commercially introduce the mouse and GUI OS long ago).
On #2: the difference between Apple and Microsoft (and just about any other company and Microsoft) is that Apple does these different experiments, they just never show them to the public. The current line of Macs, iPods, iPhones and iPods didn’t emerge fully formed in the shape you see them today. Apple most definitely has experimented with prototypes. What Apple doesn’t do is show them off to anyone. Microsoft seems to do this to establish some kind of “aren’t we smart and cool” cred, but all it does is muddy the waters, dilutes the brand and confuses people. Apple is very obsessive about only showing something in its final form. What we don’t generally see are the intermediate steps, failed experiments and other false starts that got them there.