Gaming technology has evolved over the years to make the graphics and interactivity better, but some have concluded that the “evolution” has not been a good thing. This image posted on Digg makes a lot of great points.
Are first person shooters devolving?
Disclosure:
Some of the links in this article are affiliate links and we may earn a small commission if you make a purchase, which helps us to keep delivering quality content to you.
Nintendo is finally ready to switch things up (literally). With outliving the trends, console wars and our controllers (RIP to…
A thrilling moment for gamers! The renowned Ninja Gaiden franchise has just upped the ante with this unexpected announcement of…
Xbox Console Vs Smart TV App: Although Microsoft and Sony's latest consoles continue to generate excitement, the games available are…
The long-awaited Nintendo Switch 2 is reportedly just days away from its official unveiling. According to multiple sources, the console…
Samik Sengupta
Of course they are devolving. Modern games are too easy, bombarded with eye-candy and no substance and ZERO REPLAY value. The post says it all- Older games had non linear levels which means you get to play your own way. Had tons of secrets and surprises, increased replay value. Lots of variety and memorable environments that keeps you coming back for it. Heck I don’t have any reason to remember any Call of Duty levels.
Modern game devs either never learned their lessons or doesn’t bother as modern console fed gamers don’t know any better. Give a modern gaming kid the original Doom to play and the first thing he will say “The Graphics Sucks!”.
Surely, anyone who things graphics matters more than gameplay is not even a gamer in my eye.