Is Greer’s Sirius alien real?
Either there’s a reasonable explanation for it all or “Ata” is the greatest biological find in human history. Steven Greer’s “alien”, a 6-inch tall corpse found in the Atacama Desert of Chili a decade ago, Was revealed Monday in a documentary called Sirius that left many extraterrestrial-life enthusiasts disappointed.
Spoiler ahead.
The results of the DNA testing as well as other tests and the expert opinions of the results show that the little body was that of a human, specifically a 7-year old child born from a Chilean mother. As tiny as the corpse is, it’s clear to see that this was no ordinary human boy. It wouldn’t be the first tiny human as can be seen in the image above of Junrey Balawing. He was 18-years-old in the image and stood at 23.5 inches tall.
The documentary does go into details about space and inter-dimensional travel and highlights the importance of understanding the possibilities surrounding life from other planets or dimensions. It takes a political turn and discusses how an oil-based world economy and corruption at the highest levels of government around the world prevent the human race from realizing these possibilities, even covering them up.
That should be enough to keep the alien conspiracy theorists at least a little happy with the end result even if the documentary does little to show that the body is that of an extra-terrestrial.
The documentary was driven for the most part by Greer, a former ER doctor who formed the Center for the Study of Extraterrestrial Intelligence (CSETI) and The Disclosure Project.
Here’s the trailer for the documentary followed by an analysis video from UFO enthusiast goforitrandy.
Here are some images of the alien/boy:
i’m not sure if Matt and Babu and Jesse are trolling or are just american but science supports atheism and disproves religion. what are you guys on about. science proves dinosaurs existed millions of years ago through carbon dating. evolution has been proven. and as for the alien i’m not sure if hoax just for the doco money but its not proof of any creator its small and died because it didn’t evolve on earth. i just cant stand when people mix religion and science.
I cannot help but agree with Matt. All these interesting theories but, that is all they are.
Heidegger questioned everything. “What caused that, to cause that and what caused that. I wonder also “who created the creator”
Pondering with fascination.
Yes. Yes you’re both retarded.
Yep, science certainly 100% supports creation. There is absolutely no way that an intelligent life could form through random chance. Creation is the ONLY possible answer.
My only problem with it, and it really is such a small problem that it hardly bears mentioning, is this: who created the creator? I mean, if some hyper intelligent being created us (and entropy proves he [or she or it] had to be more intelligent than us), then there had to be an even more intelligent being that created that being.
HAVING THE RAW MATERIALS AND RIGHT CONDITIONS TO SUSTAIN LIFE doesn’t mean that life can originate by chance or from non-living matter.
Proteins can’t come into existence unless there’s life first! Miller, in his famous experiment in 1953, showed that individual amino acids (the building blocks of life) could come into existence by chance. But, it’s not enough just to have amino acids. The various amino acids that make-up life must link together in a precise sequence, just like the letters in a sentence, to form functioning protein molecules. If they’re not in the right sequence the protein molecules won’t work. It has never been shown that various amino acids can bind together into a sequence by chance to form protein molecules. Even the simplest cell is made up of many millions of various protein molecules.
Also, what many don’t realize is that Miller had a laboratory apparatus that shielded and protected the individual amino acids the moment they were formed, otherwise the amino acids would have quickly disintegrated and been destroyed in the mix of random energy and forces involved in Miller’s experiment.
There is no innate chemical tendency for the various amino acids to bond with one another in a sequence. Any one amino acid can just as easily bond with any other. The only reason at all for why the various amino acids bond with one another in a precise sequence in the cells of our bodies is because they’re directed to do so by an already existing sequence of molecules found in our genetic code.
A partially-evolved cell (an oxymoron) can’t wait million of years for chance to make it complete and then become living!
Please read my popular Internet articles listed below:
ANY LIFE ON MARS CAME FROM EARTH, SCIENCE AND THE ORIGIN OF LIFE, NATURAL LIMITS OF EVOLUTION, HOW FORENSIC SCIENCE REFUTES ATHEISM, WAR AMONG EVOLUTIONISTS (2nd Edition), NO HALF-EVOLVED DINOSAURS, DOES GOD PARTICLE EXPLAIN UNIVERSE’S ORIGIN?
Visit my newest Internet site: THE SCIENCE SUPPORTING CREATION
Sincerely,
Babu G. Ranganathan*
(B.A. theology/biology)
Author of popular Internet article, TRADITIONAL DOCTRINE OF HELL EVOLVED FROM GREEK ROOTS
* I have had the privilege of being recognized in the 24th edition of Marquis “Who’s Who In The East” for my writings on religion and science, and I have given successful lectures (with question and answer time afterwards) defending creation from science before evolutionist science faculty and students at various colleges and universities.