Meta, the parent company of Facebook, Instagram, and Threads, has long faced scrutiny over its content moderation policies, especially when it comes to hate speech and misinformation. Over the years, the company has tightened and loosened its regulations in response to public pressure, political discourse, and regulatory scrutiny. Now, with its latest policy changes, Meta’s Oversight Board is preparing to review recent changes to the company’s hate speech policies on Facebook, Instagram, and Threads, marking a critical moment for content moderation on Meta’s platforms.
In January 2024, CEO Mark Zuckerberg introduced a policy shift aimed at allowing more expression on Meta-owned platforms. The update included rolling back certain protections for immigrants and LGBTQ users, a move that has sparked debate over free speech vs. platform safety.
The Oversight Board, an independent body established to review Meta’s policy decisions, has taken notice. It currently has four open cases related to hate speech and will use these cases to assess the impact of the company’s updated guidelines. According to a report by Engadget, the board’s decision could influence how Meta refines its content moderation approach moving forward.
Meta has a mixed record when it comes to adopting the Oversight Board’s recommendations. While the company is required to follow the board’s rulings on individual content cases, it has a limited obligation to make broader policy adjustments. This review will test whether Meta is willing to reevaluate its moderation approach or continue with its more lenient stance on content restrictions.
With the rise of misinformation, online harassment, and the political climate intensifying, the outcome of this review could influence how Meta shapes content regulation in the future. Whether the Oversight Board’s findings will result in actual policy changes remains to be seen.
In the high stake world of AI, chips lead in the power race of dominance, the AI world wouldn’t just have NVIDIA keeping pace, rather it will also be launching a new standard altogether. While DeepSeek R1 rattles the market temporarily, Jensen Huang remains unfazed by it all, unshaken and guiding the ship with steady hands, as competitors scramble for attention. As the rest look for a foothold, Nvidia is still riding the largest growth wave one has ever seen, proving, yet again, that the AI revolution will not stop, it has merely begun.
CEO Huang keeps pushing his company’s future ahead, brushing off worries that advances made by DeepSeek threaten sales at Nvidia. Speaking to the latest earnings call on Wednesday, the founder and chief statesman of Nvidia reiterated his confidence in the company despite what people are saying about the fallout from DeepSeek’s R1 model.
Demand for the Chip:
Huang praised the new R1 model as an “excellent innovation,” saying it actually increases demand for Nvidia technology given the huge computational requirements those reasoning models need. This came after last month’s record reduction of shares of Nvidia in the market because of news that the model of DeepSeek R1 would require much fewer chips for the training.
Huang even countered such narratives and said, “Reasoning models can consume 100 times more compute, and future reasoning models will consume much more compute. DeepSeek R1 has ignited global enthusiasm. It’s an excellent innovation, but even more importantly, it has open sourced a world-class reasoning AI model. Nearly every AI developer is applying R1”.
Record Breaking Sales:
Nvidia’s financial performance seems stronger than ever, even in the wake of some market jitters last month. The company announced yet another record quarter in which sales totalled approximately $39.3 billion, beating not only its internal estimates but also the estimates of Wall Street. Nvidia expects high growth to continue, projecting revenue in the next quarter of approximately $43 billion. Within the sales of Nvidia’s Data Center segment, one of the most important growth factors, sales nearly doubled in 2024 to $115 billion, a 16% increase since last quarter, emphasizing the never ending demand for AI chips.
AI Chip Market:
Nvidia’s CEO Huang asserted in the earnings call that its latest Blackwell chip is important, being custom designed for AI reasoning models. He said, “Current demand for it is extraordinary. We will grow strongly in 2025”. It is safe to say that, despite last month’s DeepSeek uproar, the wider AI chip market has continued to show a uniform pace of expansion. Nvidia’s future looks bright despite some recent turbulence. Record-breaking sales, soaring demand for AI chips, and major corporations such as Meta, Google, and Amazon pouring billions into AI infrastructure have ensured Nvidia’s commanding position at the top. With a growing AI revolution, Nvidia’s role as the very backbone of it seems assured. From what we know of the past, Jensen Huang is not the one keeping up, he’s the one who is actually going to lead.
This is a world where intelligent assistants are kept exclusively to setting alarms and playing music along with it misunderstanding some basic commands. However, this latest foray into Alexa+ from Amazon promises something beyond simple task accomplishments, it is a real agent with an AI engine. All things should go according to plan, for this system will update its activities to include not just stating the weather but also reserving tables and ordering grocery items, with the addition of possibly remembering one’s birthday. Alexa+ presents a dramatic foray into the world of consumer AI agents, it is a brand new evolution of the voice assistant towards which Alexa will go in helping manage day to day activities.
The big announcement was made in a keynote on a Wednesday, Alexa+ set up beyond booking reservations to managing home maintenance, and integrated a really wide net of both first and third party services. If it succeeds, Alexa+ is poised to become the most far reaching consumer AI agent, surpassing even the most ambitious competitors in terms of capability and access. Amazon signals a future where intelligent AI assistants do not just perform tasks for users, but also engage in so-called inter-agent behavior with other intelligent AI assistants for seamless integration across digital ecosystems.
Future of AI Assistance:
Amazon’s Alexa and Echo VP Daniel Rausch said, “We believe that the future is full of agents — we have believed this for some time. “There will be many AI agents out there doing things for customers, many of them will have specialized skills … And we’ve also always believed that in a world full of AI, these agents should interact with each other. They should interoperate seamlessly for customers.”
It comes at a significant time for the company, now that it is trying to revive Alexa, which hasn’t managed to generate much revenue despite years of investment. According to reports, Amazon’s hardware division has burned hundreds of billions of dollars, so Alexa+ could shape a turning point in evolution for the assistant.
AI Agents and Alexa+ Abilities:
The virtual assistants that are autonomous in their actions and can take proactive actions on the user’s behalf have become somewhat of a concept in the tech world. OpenAI and Anthropic have worked toward that goal with the development of AI models, but many implementations remain unsuccessful and inefficient, thus requiring a human in the loop for their actions.
Alexa+ from Amazon is presented in a different light as a polished and intuitive assistant capable of performing tasks that require the least amount of contact. The assistant showcased its ability to coordinate between several information sources in this case, emails, calendars, and user preferences automating mundane tasks with great efficiency. Some key capabilities showcase:
It automates your grocery shopping with Amazon Fresh, Whole Foods, and other retailers.
When products are offered at reduced prices, it smartly chooses to order them by itself.
It schedules bookings for the spa and fitness appointments through Vagaro.
It integrates with everyday services, including food through Grubhub, rides through Uber, and tickets through Ticketmaster.
The smart event planner always extracts useful information from flyers to create the right reminders.
Major Challenges:
Alexa+ seems very promising for the future but remains faced with challenges. Ever since the beginning, the AI agents have been poor at reliability, and there were reports that Alexa+ was delayed multiple times because its earlier iterations failed at even the most basic tasks of turning on and off smart home devices.
The research assistant from OpenAI, ChatGPT deep research, has been inaccurate in its results and Gemini has faced issues with providing factually accurate summaries. These issues must be dealt with for Alexa+ to become a reality for Amazon. Then there is the ever existing question about data privacy. Alexa+ depends heavily on user data to create personalized experiences, and while this welcomes greater utility, it also raises concerns about how Amazon handles sensitive personal information.
Amazon’s Strategic Advantage:
Amazon has a multitude of favorable conditions. Its position is already strong in consumers’ homes, with over 600 million Alexa enabled devices in circulation. Moreover, providing Alexa+ free of charge to Prime subscribers and charging $19.99 per month to non-prime users could speed up implementation by Amazon’s most committed users. Amazon’s vision for Alexa+ is extensive, futuristic, and ambitious. Suppose it can indeed deliver as an intelligent and autonomous AI agent. In that case, it will have a far-reaching impact on how people relate to technology within the sphere of everyday life.
Should Alexa+ meet its promises, then it could really transform how average consumers interact with AIs, setting an example for personal digital assistants. Otherwise, it could just add to Amazon’s list of grand experiments in AI and machine learning. The real challenge now will be in actualising that promise, can Alexa+ avoid the pitfall of AI limitations where other consumer agents have failed? Will it truly integrate with the intricate alliances of services and tasks it promises to manage? As yet, we do not know all the answers to these questions. Amazon is placing its wager on AI for the future, and now the world is looking for the answer to the question of whether Alexa+ will eventually become the intelligent assistant awaited by all.
Alibaba is making big waves in artificial intelligence. The Chinese e-commerce giant has now released its latest AI model, Wan 2.1,to the public, opening the doors for developers, researchers, and businesses worldwide. This move signals a major push toward open-source AI, a trend that’s shaking up the competition among tech giants.
The announcement follows a similar move by DeepSeek, a startup that caught attention earlier this year with low-cost AI models delivering impressive performance. Now, Alibaba is stepping up, releasing four versions of Wan 2.1, T2V-1.3B, T2V-14B, I2V-14B-720P, and I2V-14B-480P. Each is designed to generate highly detailed images and videos from text or image inputs. The 14B variants are the most powerful, handling 14 billion parameters, making them capable of processing vast amounts of data for more realistic visuals.
Global Access & Industry Disruption
Alibaba is rolling out these models worldwide, making them available on Alibaba Cloud’s ModelScope and HuggingFace, two of the biggest platforms for AI development. By doing this, Alibaba is not just competing with rivals like OpenAI but also giving independent developers and businesses powerful AI tools without the usual heavy price tag.
Since its launch in January, Wan 2.1 has climbed to the top of VBencha leaderboard ranking video AI models, outperforming competitors in tasks like multi-object interaction and realism. The company is doubling down on AI dominance, revealing plans to invest 380 billion yuan ($52 billion) in cloud computing and AI infrastructureover the next three years.
Not stopping there, Alibaba also previewed a new reasoning model, QwQ-Max, which will soon be open-source. The company is making it clear: AI accessibility and innovation will be key to its strategy moving forward.
By embracing open-source AI, Alibaba is positioning itself not just as a leader in e-commerce. Still, as a major force in the AI industry and with billions invested, it’s only just getting started.
In a corporate environment where policies move as quickly as software updates, Apple has maintained a stand on Diversity, Equity & Inclusion (DEI). A proposal aimed at essentially dismantling these efforts was rejected by shareholders in an overwhelming fashion, thereby confirming that the tech giant’s commitment to an inclusive workplace has not wavered. Apple’s landslide victory reinforces the notion that diversity is not just an aspirational ideal; rather, it is a pressing business imperative.
Apple Inc. shareholders voted to uphold the giant tech company’s DEI policies, an important victory for the company’s management. The vote at Apple’s annual shareholders’ meeting rejected a conservative proposal to dismantle the program. The results cast light on the ongoing debate over corporate DEI initiatives’ role and worth amid mounting political and legal scrutiny.
Corporate DEI Policies:
The National Center for Public Policy Research, a free-market think tank, shared the proposal called “Request to Cease DEI Efforts.” The supporters of the measure argued that Apple’s DEI policies would expose the company to an increasing number of discrimination lawsuits following recent changes in the law. Apple argued that it has in place active monitoring to reduce legal risk, emphasizing further that this proposal improperly restraints management’s ability to oversee corporate policy.
The shareholder vote was decisive, with 210.45 million votes cast in favor of the proposal and an immense 8.84 billion votes cast in opposition. This ringing defeat is evidence that investors continue to trust Apple’s commitment to defend DEI, while major companies like Meta have been reduced in their similar endeavours under political pressures.
Company’s Global DEI Initiatives and Approach:
Apple does provide diversity data about its employees, but it does not maintain official hiring quotas or targets. Instead, the company focuses on initiatives like its racial justice program, which funds historically Black colleges and universities in America. DEI efforts abroad include coding education for indigenous peoples in Mexico and partnering with local Aboriginal non-profits in Australia to pursue criminal justice reform.
Apple’s approach to diversity has been scrutinized by shareholders in the past. Earlier proposals calling for greater transparency on racial and gender based pay gaps were rejected as well. While the company remains firmly committed to fostering an inclusive workforce, CEO Tim Cook during the meeting said, “Strength has always come from hiring the very best people and then providing a culture of collaboration, one where people with diverse backgrounds and perspectives come together to innovate”. Tim admitted that Apple’s DEI approach may someday have to change, depending on the law, but core values of dignity and respect will not be compromised. Cook added that, “as the legal landscape around these issues evolves, we may need to make some changes to comply, but our North Star of dignity and respect for everyone and our work to that end will never waver”.
Broader Corporate Trend:
Apple’s blunt rejection of the anti DEI proposal stands in contrast to general trends in corporate America. A growing number of larger companies have recently been toning down or even reversing their DEI initiatives because of political and legal pressures, especially since President Donald Trump condemned such programs and suggested he would investigate their legality. This same conservative group that worked to undermine Apple’s DEI agenda also targeted Costco Wholesale to pressure it to consider some of the risks of its own diversity program. The Costco shareholders voted against the proposal in January, affirming a growing corporate resistance to dismantling DEI programs in the face of mounting conservative opposition.
Apart from the DEI vote, Apple shareholders rejected a second proposal that called on the company to assess risks connected with its work in artificial intelligence. The AI plan commanded more shareholder support than any other initiative, 1.04 billion votes in favor but was voted down in the end, with 7.96 billion votes cast in opposition. Apple was rewarded for all its management proposals, including the so-called “say on pay” executive compensation plan.
Apple’s U.S. Investments with Trump:
The day before the shareholder meeting, Apple grabbed the spotlight by announcing a plan to invest $500 billion over four years in the U.S, Donald Trump praised the move a few days after reports emerged about a meeting between Tim Cook and Trump. During this occasion, Cook reaffirmed Apple’s commitment to domestic manufacturing, which includes being Taiwan Semiconductor Manufacturing Company TSMC’s largest customer for its Arizona factory, this project was initiated by Trump during his first term to bring TSMC to the U.S.
The shareholder vote at Apple illustrates the firm’s solemn commitment to DEI declarations despite the increasingly politicized and legal challenges it faces. Shareholders overwhelmingly rejected the anti-DEI proposal, signifying a firm ground for inclusive corporate governance, even when other firms have retreated from such commitments. As the legal and cultural backdrop concerning workplace equity subsides away, Apple has once again reasserted that this is not just a matter of social responsibility and that inclusivity is an advantage. The corporate focus will now be on future investments in the U.S. and innovations with AI and on how Apple will balance its values against the pressures of changing regulations. While the world outside changes, Apple will continue to operate under its tenets that will affect diversity and inclusion moving forward.
Possibly dating back to the era of sci-fi, humanity’s dream of infinite clean energy has always seemed extravagant until now. With barely a two year existence, Proxima Fusion, a German startup, has taken a gigantic leap toward fulfilling that dream by making its well-argued plans for a real life fusion power plant. Proxima is not just making some heady claims, it is proving that the energy future is closer than we think. If its design works, then we enter an era where the power will be cheap, clean, and devoid of carbon and radioactive waste.
Proxima Fusion, a German startup, is now receiving praises for its disruptive fusion reactor design, a major step forward for nuclear fusion technology. The young company, just two years old, has already published detailed plans for a working fusion power plant in a peer-reviewed journal, possibly turning the tide in the global race to achieve unlimited clean energy.
New Era of Nuclear Fusion:
Unlike traditional nuclear fission reactors producing radioactive wastes, nuclear fusion can generate large amounts of energy, leaving no carbon footprint and little radiation. The two main classes of fusion reactors, Tokamak and Stellarator, confine fusion plasma with a large electromagnetic force. The Tokamaks have external electromagnets and induced plasma current but suffer from stability, whereas the Stellarators with external electromagnets allow theoretically for stable continuous operation.
According to Proxima Fusion co-founder and CEO, Francesco Sciortino, the ‘Stellaris’ design is based on the Stellarator concept and it is the first peer-reviewed fusion power plant model that is able to show reliable continuous operation absent of the instabilities typical for Tokamaks and other fusion methods.
Proxima’s Dedication:
The research of startup Proxima got published in the journal Fusion Engineering and Design, which points out Proxima’s dedication to transparency and improved cooperation in the scientific community. Sciortino said, “Our American friends can see it. Our Chinese friends can see it. Our claim is that we can execute on this faster than anyone else, and we do that by creating a framework for integrated physics, engineering and economics. So we’re not a science project anymore”.
He added, “We started out as a group of founders saying it’s going to take us two years to get to the Stellaris design… We actually finished after one year. So we’ve accelerated by a year”. This extraordinary vision has already brought tremendous results. Proxima had set a two year goal for the Stellaris design, but it managed to accomplish it in just one year. The company bagged $35 million from the European Union and the German government, as well as $30 million from venture capital, raising its total funding to $65 million to build a fully operational fusion reactor by 2031.
Competitive Scenario:
Proxima Fusion is going to encounter some serious competitors as it works its way up in the global fusion race. Commonwealth Fusion Systems is another rival that has proved to be one of the toughest during this race since it is backed by Breakthrough Energy Ventures Fund led by Bill Gates. However, the breakthrough achieved by Proxima with Stellaris puts QI-HTS Stellarators at the forefront of commercial fusion technology. Ian Hogarth, a Partner at Plural, one of Proxima Fusion’s earliest investors, said, “When Proxima started its journey, the founders said, ‘This is possible, we’ll prove it to you.’ And they did. Stellaris positions QI-HTS Stellarators as the leading technology in the global race to commercial fusion”.
With its phenomenal design, considerably advanced development timeline, and commitment to open-source science, Proxima Fusion is indeed well on its way toward becoming a leading player in the future quest for sustainable energy. A target year of 2031 looms ahead for the working fusion reactor, and everyone will be waiting to see whether Proxima is able to truly make reality out of the future harvest of limitless energy.
As AI-powered tools become more integral to professional and academic research, OpenAI is broadening access to its Deep Research feature. Previously reserved for ChatGPT Pro users, this advanced web browsing agent is now available to all paying users, including Plus, Team, Enterprise, and Edu subscribers. With this expansion, OpenAIgives users 10 deep research queries per month, allowing them to generate comprehensive reports on various topics. Meanwhile, ChatGPT Pro users, who subscribe at $200 per month, will now receive 120 queries, up from 100 at launch.
The move highlights OpenAI’s strategy to make AI-powered research tools a key selling point for its premium tiers. As competition in AI research tools heats up, Google and Perplexity are racing to roll out similar deep research capabilities. Google recently launched its deep research agent for Gemini Advanced users, signaling a clear industry shift toward AI-generated long-form analysis.
For AI companies, deep research features are more than just an added tool—they are a way to demonstrate the value of premium AI subscriptions. However, OpenAI acknowledges that it must refine how these agents interact with users and how they could influence decision-making. By expanding Deep Research to a broader audience, OpenAI is positioning itself at the forefront of AI-driven knowledge generation, reinforcing AI’s role in assisting professionals, educators, and researchers with in-depth, automated analysis.
Today the internet seems to have changed the information aspect, it just actually smashed the monopoly of the old media. Newspapers, television networks, and magazines once had the whole say in the news cycle. A viral tweet, a blog post, or a YouTube video can create public opinion faster than any front-page headline today. Yet, even after being around for more than a couple of decades, most of the traditional media still do not get the basic essence of the web.
They still hold on to old business models, underestimate the power of algorithms, and completely fail to grasp that audiences today require interactive engagement with the content and not just passive consumption. The web is a fast-moving, vibrant flux, whereas here credibility is built through engagement and interaction rather than just by authority. Those refusing to either change or adapt will be left behind in the dust of obsolescence.
Far removed are the old dictatorial paramount of media still out of touch with five things concerning the web.
1. People Never Wanted to Pay for the News
Five Things Old Media Still Don't Get About The Web 14
Traditional media has long assumed that because people once paid for newspapers, they would be willing to pay for digital news. But the reality is, that people weren’t paying for the news itself, news was just one part of a larger package. Newspapers bundled news with classifieds, weather updates, stock prices, and entertainment sections, all of which are now available online for free and in real-time. This makes selling digital news subscriptions a tough challenge.
Readers today have countless free options for news. Social media, blogs, and independent news sites provide instant updates, often faster than traditional outlets. The old model of paying for access to journalism simply does not align with modern consumer expectations. Unless media companies offer something significantly different and more valuable, people won’t pay.
People Pay Only for Something Special: If a news site offers unique, high-quality content, some people might pay, but it has to be worth it.
People Want Free News: If the same news is available for free elsewhere, no one wants to pay for it.
Old Newspapers Had More Than Just News: People bought newspapers for job ads, classifieds, and entertainment, not just news.
Social Media is Faster: Platforms like Twitter and Facebook break news instantly, often before big news websites.
Trust Issues with Big Media: Many people think traditional news is biased, so they look for independent sources.
2. Paywalls Break the Web and Annoy Your Customers
Five Things Old Media Still Don't Get About The Web 15
Paywalls create a frustrating experience for readers. Imagine coming across an interesting article, clicking on the link, and immediately being blocked by a paywall demanding a subscription. Most people will simply close the tab and move on.
The web thrives on openness and sharing, but paywalls restrict access and limit the spread of information. Instead of encouraging engagement, they push readers toward free alternatives. While some premium outlets can sustain a paywall because they provide unique and valuable content, the vast majority of news sites struggle because their audience isn’t willing to pay when free sources are just a click away.
Only Exclusive Content Can Justify Paywalls: Sites with deep investigative journalism or unique insights might succeed, but basic news won’t.
Readers Hate Paywalls: Most people won’t subscribe just to read one article, they’ll leave and find free news elsewhere.
The Web is Built for Sharing: Paywalls block content from spreading, making articles less influential and reducing traffic.
Free Alternatives Win Every Time: When so much news is available for free, most people won’t pay unless the content is truly exceptional.
Paywalls Kill Engagement: Instead of building loyal readers, they push visitors away before they even start reading.
3. The Web Needs New Solutions, Not Digital Replicas of Print
Five Things Old Media Still Don't Get About The Web 16
Many media companies assume that converting print articles into digital formats will attract paying subscribers. But the internet demands more than just text, it thrives on interactivity, multimedia, and innovation.
A digital newspaper that merely mimics the print experience offers no additional value. Readers expect engaging visuals, interactive elements, and real-time updates. Successful digital media outlets embrace video content, podcasts, and immersive storytelling instead of relying on static articles.
Innovation Drives Success: The best digital platforms experiment with storytelling, AI-driven recommendations, and interactive infographics to keep audiences hooked.
Static Text is Boring: Readers expect interactive content, not just scanned newspaper pages on a screen.
Multimedia Wins Attention: Videos, podcasts, and animations engage users far more than plain text.
Real-Time Updates Matter: Unlike print, digital news must evolve constantly to stay relevant.
Readers Want a Two-Way Conversation: Comment sections, polls, and live discussions create engagement, not just passive reading.
4. People Pirate Because They Get a Better Experience
Five Things Old Media Still Don't Get About The Web 17
Piracy isn’t just about getting content for free, it’s about convenience. When legal options come with restrictions like DRM limitations, region locks, and excessive advertisements, piracy becomes the more attractive alternative.
The best way to combat piracy isn’t through lawsuits or crackdowns, it’s by offering a better user experience. Streaming services like Netflix and Spotify have shown that people are willing to pay for content when it is convenient, affordable, and high-quality. Instead of making access difficult, media companies should focus on making their content more appealing than the pirated version.
Convenience Always Wins: When platforms make content easy to access at a fair price, piracy naturally declines.
Piracy is Faster: No forced ads, no region locks, just instant access.
No DRM Hassles: Pirated content doesn’t come with restrictions that limit how and where users can watch.
Better Accessibility: Legal platforms sometimes remove content, but pirated versions stay available indefinitely.
High Prices Push Users Away: Many people pirate simply because legal alternatives are too expensive.
5. Filesharing and Piracy Do Not Always Represent Lost Sales
Five Things Old Media Still Don't Get About The Web 18
Media companies often claim that piracy causes massive revenue losses. However, not every person who pirates content would have paid for it otherwise. Many people download content they were never planning to buy in the first place, meaning those aren’t truly lost sales.
In some cases, piracy even helps media companies by increasing exposure. Shows like Game of Thrones gained massive popularity by being widely pirated, ultimately benefiting HBO in terms of brand recognition and merchandise sales. Instead of focusing solely on preventing piracy, media companies should look for ways to convert casual viewers into paying customers.
People Pay When It’s Easy & Affordable: Many former pirates now subscribe to platforms like Netflix, proving that convenience wins over restriction.
Not Every Pirate is a Lost Customer: Many people who pirate wouldn’t have paid for the content anyway, so there’s no real revenue loss.
Free Publicity Can Drive Sales: Pirated content often increases awareness, leading to more paying customers in the long run.
Merchandise & Spin-offs Make Money: Shows and movies gain loyal fans through piracy, who then buy official merchandise, tickets, and subscriptions.
Piracy Shows Demand: High piracy rates indicate strong interest, which media companies can capitalize on by improving accessibility.
The internet isn’t just another distribution channel, it has fundamentally changed how people consume information. Old media companies that cling to outdated models will continue to struggle, while those that embrace new digital strategies will thrive.
Successful media businesses adapt to online habits. They prioritize accessibility, shareability, and user engagement over rigid paywalls and traditional publishing formats. Instead of forcing outdated business models onto digital audiences, they evolve to meet modern expectations
Adapt or Get Left BehindThe media industry faces a choice: continue fighting against the way the internet works or embrace change. Those who resist digital transformation will fade into irrelevance, while those who innovate will define the future of news and content distribution.
The question is, who will adapt before it’s too late?
AI: The Game Changer in Digital Media
Artificial intelligence is reshaping the media landscape. It’s not just about automation, it’s about personalization, efficiency, and smarter content distribution. AI helps media companies:
Deliver Personalized Content: AI-powered algorithms curate news feeds, recommend articles, and tailor content to individual interests, keeping audiences engaged.
Enhance User Experience: Chatbots, AI-generated summaries, and interactive tools make consuming information faster and more intuitive.
Optimize Ad Revenue: AI-driven analytics help media companies understand reader behavior, allowing them to target ads more effectively and increase revenue.
Detects Trends in Real Time: AI scans social media, forums, and search trends to predict viral topics before they even break into mainstream news.
Automate Content Creation: AI can assist in generating news reports, writing summaries, and even producing video content, speeding up production without compromising quality.
Creating the best chatbot is no longer a race nowadays; it’s got to do with who is throwing the biggest dollars in the future. With that in mind, here comes Perplexity, the latest in technology, and now with its own venture capital fund, an AI-powered search engine that caused rather a stir in the industry. Perplexity walks into the investor’s hall with fresh $50 million reserved for early startup investment, ready to discover what’s next big in AI and tech. It seems like Perplexity’s AI is smart enough to invest in people for now. However, with big bucks come big questions about who is getting funded and is Perplexity setting itself up as the Google of startup investments?
Perplexity, developer of an AI-powered search engine, has ventured into the venture capital arena by launching a $50 million seed and pre-seed fund, as reported by CNBC. Following their recent funding of $500 million at a $9 billion valuation, the company is using some of its own money in the fund’s cornerstone, while well proclaimed money comes from limited partners.
Perplexity dives into Venture Capital:
Kelly Graziadei and Joanna Lee Shevelenko are the GPs for the new fund. They previously co-founded f7 Ventures, an early-stage investment firm backing companies like women’s health startup Midi. It is still unclear if Graziadei and Shevelenko will continue in an advisory capacity with f7 Ventures or concentrate on Perplexity’s venture fund.
Through its venture capital foray, Perplexity seeks to nurture forward-thinking early-stage companies in AI and technology. This puts the company in the same league as other AI giants that have set up funds aimed at nurturing the next generation of tech immigrant businesses.
Perplexity VS OpenAI Investment Approach:
With the formation of its very own venture fund, Perplexity creates the juxtaposition with OpenAI, which itself has an investment scheme, namely the OpenAI Startup Fund. The contours of distinction arise in that OpenAI explained that it does not use its own funds to invest. Perplexity, however, has decided to use at least some part of its funds to capitalize its new venture.
Implications for the Ecosystem of Startups:
With this fund development, Perplexity is not just establishing itself in the AI and tech ecosystem but also providing necessary capital for startups that resonate with its vision. This action gives a nod to the heightened trend where AI firms are increasingly flexing their financial muscles to start their own investment vehicles to ensure innovation and strike strategic partnerships in the industry. It would be interesting to see what startups come into play as the fund emerges and how Perplexity’s investment strategy will put a mark in contributing to the shaping of AI and technology businesses. Now that the fund is beginning to deploy capital, all eyes will be on Perplexity to see if it can search for, and invest in the next billion-dollar idea.
Meta is reportedly exploring a massive $200 billion investment in a next-generation AI data centre campus, signalling an aggressive push into artificial intelligence infrastructure. According to a report from The Information, Meta executives have been in discussions with data centre developers and have scouted potential locations in Louisiana, Wyoming, and Texas as part of the early planning stages.
However, a Meta spokesperson denied the report, stating that the company’s capital expenditure plans have already been disclosed, and anything beyond that is “pure speculation.” Despite this, industry analysts believe that such an expansion aligns with Meta’s growing AI ambitions, particularly after CEO Mark Zuckerberg confirmed last month that the company intends to spend up to $65 billion in 2024 to expand its AI infrastructure.
Tech Giants in a Race for AI Dominance
If the reported $200 billion project moves forward, it would dwarf Meta’s previous spending and position the company as a dominant player in the AI infrastructure race. Tech giants like Microsoft and Amazon are also ramping up their AI investments, with Microsoft planning an $80 billion investment in data centres for fiscal 2025 and Amazon expecting to surpass its $75 billion infrastructure spending from 2024.
Since the launch of ChatGPT in 2022, the AI sector has seen an unprecedented surge in investment, with companies across industries rushing to integrate AI-driven capabilities into their products and services.
Meta’s AI Ambitions and the Future of AI Computing
As Meta expands its AI and metaverse initiatives, its potential data center expansion could be critical to supporting its long-term artificial intelligence and machine learning advancements. Although official confirmation of the $200 billion project remains uncertain, Meta’s increasing AI infrastructure investments signal a fierce competition among tech giants to dominate the next era of AI-powered computing. Whether this rumored mega-campus materializes or not, the race to build the most advanced AI data centers is only intensifying.
DeepSeek has entered into the game changer territory of AI, wherein tech giants are choking each other for supremacy, with the release of its low-cost AI models, the company shocked the AI community and challenged the very definition of innovation when it comes to AI. Now that DeepSeek is ahead of its schedule in launching its newest AI model R2, the world is watching, some with excitement, others with unease.The Hangzhou startup recently accessed the global source markets with its cost-effective yet high-performing AI model R1 and is now pushing home the credit.
With the success of R1, which started a $1 trillion global equities sell-off, DeepSeek’s rapid developments are closely being followed by competition and regulators alike. Rumors around the company have brightened up the release originally set for early May, suggesting plans to push back the launch. While insiders are not yet given permission for an official comment on where R2 stands for development, reports indicate the new model would provide enhanced coding capabilities and superior reasoning across many languages apart from English. This initiative is seen within the geographical focus on advancing a strong position in AI at a time of tight geopolitics and economics.
DeepSeek’s Unconventional Standpoint:
It runs more like a research lab rather than a corporation in the sense of conventional Chinese tech firms such as cut-throat hierarchies and tiring work hours. Founder Liang Wenfeng, instructed the culture of innovation by attracting the best algorithm engineers and establishing a very flat management style. Employees describe working in an environment where research interest and creativity come before corporate bureaucracy. A 26-year-old researcher, Benjamin Liu, who left the company in September, said, “Liang gave us control and treated us as experts. He constantly asked questions and learned alongside us. DeepSeek allowed me to take ownership of critical parts of the pipeline, which was very exciting”.
Deepseek’s R1 model made headlines by outperforming its competition even though it was trained on less powerful Nvidia chips. Whereas hundreds of billions have been poured into AI research by U.S tech titans like OpenAI and Google, DeepSeek showed that a cost-effective solution can also yield top tier results. Industry experts believe that the launch of R2 could further disrupt the AI landscape, making Western firms rethink their pricing strategies against such offerings and technological approaches.
Geopolitical Implications:
DeepSeek’s rapid rise is not merely a business success story, it has serious geopolitical repercussions. Both the U.S and China have identified AI leadership as a national priority, and DeepSeek’s developments will likely provoke further concern in Washington. In the meantime, Chinese authorities have embraced DeepSeek, incorporating its models into state and corporate systems at a strikingly fast pace so far. At least 13 Chinese city governments and 10 state owned enterprises are already using DeepSeek technology, further entrenching its role as a critical player in China’s AI ambitions.
High-Flyer’s Strategic Investments:
High-Flyer has invested heavily in AI research and infrastructure, which underpins DeepSeek’s ability to develop competitive AI models at less than half the cost. Long before this boom gripped the industry, the fund was one of the earliest adopters of AI-driven trading and committed 70% of its annual revenue to AI research. By 2021, it had already acquired in-house basic computing infrastructure, two supercomputing AI clusters featuring Nvidia A100 chips purchases that later proved critical when the U.S restricted advanced semiconductor technologies with China.
Global Scrutiny:
DeepSeek’s innovations are draped in praise in China, elsewhere, however, they are the object of great mistrust. Some Western governments, along with South Korea and Italy, announced the removal from its national app stores of any application developed by DeepSeek, citing privacy and security. Even then, some analysts warned of the possibility that a Chinese state entity may turn the DeepSeek models into a noun, much to the anger of everyone else, based on this perception, Western countries would likely impose restrictions on AI chip exports and software collaboration in retaliation, thus increasing the competition in the AI arena. An ever present concern is the restriction on the export of advanced AI chips, and from there, to really establish the serious testing of innovation would be the ability on the technological side to keep a perceived edge abroad with no access to top technological hardware.
In light of the rapidly approaching launch of R2, it is evident that this AI field is also undergoing transformative and convulsive changes. The ability of DeepSeek to create competitive models at a fraction of the cost has not only disrupted the markets but led to an escalating AI arms race between China and the West. Only time will illuminate the full repercussions of DeepSeek’s mind bending developments, but it is a fair prediction that AI’s strategic ingenuity will be a vessel in which its future will be developed. Whether this will spark collaboration, competition, or a regulatory onslaught remains uncertain, but there surely lies an exciting and turbulent ride ahead for the industry.
TikTok, the virtual stage where blooming viral trends and some dance moves dare to question cultural viability, has now dipped its toe into history. Along with its Chinese counterpart, Douyin, it made headlines by becoming the first non-gaming app to generate a staggering $6 billion in revenue from in-app purchases in the year 2024. As per the report of Sensor Tower on App Intelligence, it is a new record for TikTok to have grossed $1.9 billion in IAP revenue in the fourth quarter of last year. If any social media has done a definite financial mic drop, that would be it.
TikTok’s Revenue and Other Apps:
From all the non-gaming apps, only YouTube and Google One can feasibly provoke TikTok’s Q4 revenue for a full calendar year. In any case, TikTok’s annual IAP revenue surpassed all other competitors and, in fact, is more than double the revenue of any other app or game in 2024. MONOPOLY GO!, TikTok’s closest competitor, could only bag $2.6 billion in the past year in IAP revenue, thus coming in a very distant second.
TikTok has had a successful economic run, starting with a sudden year on year rise from $4.4 billion in 2023 to a new high of $6 billion in 2024. The app did seal the second most downloaded app position in Q4 2024, with Instagram taking the top slot. WhatsApp, Facebook, and Temu for e-commerce made up the remainder of the top five.
TikTok-Douyin Comparison:
Money makes the direct comparison between TikTok and other apps inherently flawed in itself because of revenue accounts being pushed for Douyin, the Chinese counterpart. ByteDance owns the two platforms and follow relatively similar short-form video models. However, they serve entirely different markets, Douyin implements a tighter integration with e-commerce, heavy regulation with respect to Chinese authorities, while TikTok contains various forms of content in an audience oriented manner across the globe.
Challenges for TikTok’s Market:
In the U.S. regulatory scrutiny, there have been some attempts to take TikTok down from app stores for national security purposes. However, there was a 75-day delay following an executive order from Donald Trump, during which the ban could potentially be extended. TikTok has left an economically permanent mark through thick and thin, especially with regard to the creator economy. Users can buy virtual gifts for their favorite creators, who, in turn, may convert them into real currency. TikTok will keep 50% of the cash from these transactions, where the transactions go back to its revenue in the momentum.
TikTok has secured its way as a giant in digital entertainment and social media. With in-app revenue amounting to $6 billion and a catch on global culture that no other platform can rival, TikTok creates a financial dominance that is impossible to hide. Its ability to monetize virtual gifts, engage users, and power the economy of creators has cemented its place as the unstoppable force that it is, notwithstanding the restrictions and competition in social media. Whether by means of viral dance challenges or shopping via the app, TikTok is not just a social media app, it is an economic powerhouse that is redefining digital entertainment.
