July 12, 2011

New plans, pricing for Netflix cuts regulation problems off at the pass

Netflix

Those who have watched the evolution of Netflix over the years are probably aware that the company has done an excellent job of keeping current and having their products reflect the current times. That has slowed lately as the movie rental company seemed to have been stuck in a rut, offering few changes when they seemed appropriate. The rut is over. Netflix today announced that they would be changing their plans and pricing to “better reflect the costs of each” and to give more relevant choices. Here’s the breakdown of the new monthly pricing:

  • Mail 1 out at-a-time: $7.99
  • Mail 2 out at-a-time: $11.99
  • Streaming: $7.99
This model compares to the old model from last November that was pushing a bit too hard to go after streaming only. A customer could get the streaming-only for the same price but only had to pay an additional $2 a month to get DVDs mailed as well. Now, the plans are completely separate and there are no breaks for going with both streaming and by mail. Most would see this as bad news because it’s a price hike. I love the move. It’s not that I want to pay more money for anything. I simply see it as a good business decision by a company that needs to succeed for our sake.

Addressing the problem

Congestion It has been well-publicized that Netflix eats up 20% of broadband during peak hours. This is a problem now, but it may turn into a killer later if they aren’t able to get it fixed. The government is talking. Big telecom is talking. Netflix is not a popular company in many circles because of taking so much. For the last 2 years, the company has been making a push to get more people onto streaming because of the profitability – less handling, no postage, and no physical disks to send makes streaming videos more appealing to the bottom line. The problem, however, is that the restrictions that are heading their way (either from the government or from ISPs) could hurt the streaming aspect of their business model. While they may have had dreams of abandoning mail eventually, they must now switch gears to encourage it.

A price hike will increase by-mail demand

Price Hike It sounds completely backwards. Why would anyone believe that raising the price from a $2 add-on to a $7.99 service would actually increase the number of videos being served? As new and old subscribers look at their options, they will now have to choose. The customer who wants to stream sometimes and receive in the mail at other times get no break. Most will choose one or the other. With availability of options much higher on the by-mail plan, many will go with one of those two options and may or may not add streaming for another $7.99. Either way, Netflix wins. For $15.98, a consumer can have both options, and that’s just fine for Netflix as it’s a 60% increase over the current dual plan. Those who stop streaming and continue to receive by mail will be paying 20% less than than they were before, but they’ll also stop being part of the streaming-overload problem that is causing grief today and potential catastrophe in the future if restrictions come.

Too good to succeed

Blockbuster Closing No, they’re not going to go the way of Blockbuster. They are way too innovative to suffer that fate, but it’s important to note that their success has been at the expense of others in the past. The way that things were before this announcement, the company was doomed to fail in the future. It wasn’t their fault. Streaming has had more of an impact on our internet infrastructure than they imagined and it has pointed too many eyeballs towards them. They had to switch things up to lighten the load. In the future, they’ll be able to push again for more streaming and eventually faze-out the mail model almost entirely, but only when the internet infrastructure is ready to handle the load. Their product and popularity have made the company a problem, but technology will catch up. They were simply ahead of their time.

Disclosure:

Some of the links in this article are affiliate links and we may earn a small commission if you make a purchase, which helps us to keep delivering quality content to you.

JD Rucker

JD Rucker is Editor at Soshable, a Social Media Marketing Blog. He is a Christian, a husband, a father, and founder of both Judeo Christian Church and Dealer Authority. He drinks a lot of coffee, usually in the form of a 5-shot espresso over ice.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Similar Stories

Five Things Old Media Still Don’t Get About The Web

Five Things Old Media Still Don’t Get About The Web

November 18, 2022

Today the internet seems to have changed the information aspect, it just actually smashed the monopoly of the old media....

The Currency of The Internet Is Personal Data

The Currency of The Internet Is Personal Data

July 30, 2012

Imagine a world where money is not the most valuable asset, your data is. Every time you browse, shop, or...

India’s AI Ambitions: Can It Catch Up in the Global Race?

India’s AI Ambitions: Can It Catch Up in the Global Race?

February 20, 2025

The world of Artificial Intelligence (AI) is evolving rapidly, with China and the US leading the way in developing powerful...

Similar Stories

The Social Media Monster

The Social Media Monster

September 17, 2012

The monster never sleeps, never stops watching, and never lets go. It whispers in your ear the moment you wake...

The Currency of The Internet Is Personal Data

The Currency of The Internet Is Personal Data

July 30, 2012

Imagine a world where money is not the most valuable asset, your data is. Every time you browse, shop, or...

5 Reasons That Social Media May Never Die

5 Reasons That Social Media May Never Die

November 18, 2022

“Never” is a bold word. It is absolute and endless. To say that something can never happen is one of...