Why Apple’s Distortion Field Works

When Steve Jobs recently made an appearance on Apple’s earnings call, he – to put it mildly – caused quite a stir. He said 7″ tablets like RIM’s Playbook and the Samsung Galaxy Tab will be DOA. He argued that the fragmented nature of Android is “a nightmare”.
Put in a more straightforward fashion, he smacked a lot of people down.
Yet, many rushed to smack him in return. RIM CEO Jim Balsillie suggested that people will soon tire of Apple telling them what to think. A Tweetdeck developer, whom Jobs referenced when talking about Android’s fragmentation, responded with bewilderment, saying that they have two developers working on their Android app and that it was fine. And good on them all. Jobs’ comments were, if nothing else, pretty arrogant.
But Jobs’ incendiary statements were also evidence of how the man thinks: my way may not be for everyone, but it’s the best way. And with Apple reporting an incredible $20 billion of revenue, it seems many agree.
So why is that that Steve Jobs and Apple in general command so much attention? And more to the point, why does this Apple “reality distortion field exist”?
What Is The Distortion Field?
Obviously, the Apple Reality Distortion field is not a real thing. But it is a useful term to describe a couple of interesting phenomena that surround Apple products:
- Apple the company seems to set the terms of debate in the tech world. Once the touch-screen arrived, it was touch-screen vs. keyboards. Closed vs. open debates are now about Apple vs. Google. Form vs. function arguments frequently reference Apple’s design. Apple is the company who have become a lightning rod for contemporary discussion about technology.
- Apple is perceived to be first to the market, even when it is not. Take something like Airplay. It, at least in theory, differs little from the DLNA wireless standard, but many blogs are calling it a gamechanger. Similarly, Steve Jobs called Facetime “the first video calling on a mobile device”, which it clearly isn’t.
- Users of Apple products fervently defend them against criticism.
So this is something we tech nerds know. But why does this happen?
Apple Has Become a Symbol
Nerds on the web (like us) often look at products in terms sheer functionality. I know I for one was pretty amazed when, on my Android phone, I could directly upload photos to Dropbox or simply install a new media player because I didn’t like the stock one. You can’t do this with Apple products, we claim.
But when people use examples like that as an example of why Apple ‘ain’t all that great’, what they miss is that Apple is not simply a tech company, but a cultural symbol. It isn’t necessarily about ‘sheeple’ or Apple’s marketing successes as much as much as it is that Apple, the media and the public have positioned Apple as a sign of the cultural importance and potential of technology.
For at least the last hundred years, technology has become the thing in our culture that is symbolic of how we’re moving into the future. And Apple has become the company many in our culture look to to determine the direction of that movement: what the trends will be, what technology will dominate etc.
How Apple Got There
So how is it that Apple became this symbol? Well first, it is not the only one. Google are there too, as are RIM, Sony and, even though people don’t realize it, Microsoft too.
But Apple seem to be the most prominent because of a simple, overlooked fact: its products are really obvious. You don’t have to be a tech-nerd to understand that touch screens are neat. You don’t have to be a geek to know that carrying around your music collection and scrolling through it quickly is useful. You don’t have to care about software to know that the way the App Store manages updates is really plain and clear. The benefits of Facetime are clear; no-one cares that you could do it on a Nokia phone years ago.
The point is that Apple’s grand sweeping statements (“we think this is the future of everything!”) connect with people quite easily. And because its products impact culture and not just tech – in things like the mobile web, the iPod, or the iPad – Apple can say what it wants because they are the ones setting the tone of the discussion. It is Apple who is showing everyone, rather than tech geeks, what technology is capable of and how it makes your life better.
What’s more, love them or hate them, Apple has innovated in creative, exciting ways. Whether touch-screens, iTunes, the App Store, the Macbook Air or the iPad, Apple is doing things before others. That’s key. It means that Steve Jobs can be an arrogant jerk because he can actually back it up.
So sure, the ‘reality distortion field’ can be annoying. Sometimes Apple will claim slightly crazy things – like open is bad, or that Android is terrible. Sometimes people forget that other companies are doing things that are just as exciting and innovative. But without understanding the reason for it – that Apple has become our culture’s symbol for how technology is supposed to work – it will never change, and we’ll be in Steve’s thrall for as long as he’s around.
Last time i checked “you’re holding it wrong” didnt need a distortion field to sound stupid.
Just out of curiosity, absolutely no trolling or flame, could Apple get sued for false advertising?
The thing is, a lot of their products are NOT the first to do it. Videocalling for example was available in Japan for at least a decade or so. I had Sony Ericsson K800 in Europe that could do videocalls. And there are many many other examples where Apple claims to be the first, but in reality, they are not.
It’s like if BMW made a new series of cars, and said “We made world’s first car that can accelerate really fast!!!!”. We all know that is not true.
All of those Apple claims “first this, first that” are just not true in most cases.
They are probably all true in some form/fashion. Facetime is basically one click video conferencing so it is the first for the masses.
Apple’s strength is as you alluded to – it just works and it’s the PERFECT timing. Earlier in the cycle of CE & PC’s – people bought into the “magic” that devices could provide but it either didn’t work or was just too hard (ie: a Pc did not mean your kid would become an astronaut). Look at mac ads or iphones, what do you promise you – not a lot but that’s what the average person wants. Look at the ridicules droid ads with the robot arms or the WIn ads where MS seems to be saying they take credit for our work and our users are all deluded into thinking they are better looking than they are? WTH? Or the stupidest ads for the palm launch – this pale model saying all the lights would turn green. Who believes that a smartphone would do that. People accuse apple of hype but really – they are anti hype. again, look at the phone ads, I tap the screen and I can facetime – and in reality, it works exactly like that – no robotic arm necessary – no hype and now, people are buying because they realize it’s the truth.
I wanted to enjoy your article but there were a lot of grammatical errors that turned me off. And coming from me that says a lot it case you were wondering 😛
I must say though Google is following the same path as Microsoft which will inevitably hurt them. All the cultural icon/symbol stuff aside something that Apple offers a complete experience. From manufacturing, to support, to training, to repairs, so on and so forth until infinity. Their products “just work” as Steve says as well as the unity of Apple’s products. Android is on so many different phones, with so many manufacturers, with so many carriers, and with so many different versions.
The below statement revolves around Apple’s Mobile Devices:
99% don’t care if you can download a different media player and it’s not because “the media and the public have positioned Apple as a sign of the cultural importance and potential of technology.” rather people just don’t care because what comes on an Apple device “just works” for those 99%.
Really nice article! Apple is and always will be at the top of technology, whether we like it or not, or whether other companies produce better stuff or not. Apple has achieved something that no other company has or ever will achive. Getting non-technophiles to love technology!
SaveTheCoder – I don’t know about “always will be”. Things are cyclical and Apple isn’t immune to that. The arrogance level is always an indicator of an impending fall; like Microsoft 15 years ago.
Google is doing their thing and Microsoft is resurging so we could be in for a TON of innovation with three big competitors spending and competing.
@JD “The arrogance level is always an indicator of an impending fall; like Microsoft 15 years ago.”
So Apple no has 15 years of unabated growth and record profits ahead before it’s fall. Oh wait, Microsoft never fell although it’s sun has set. Google? Watch them fail as they lose control of Android.
I’d say “top of marketing” rather than “top of technology” as most of what they do isn’t original, they are just excellent at wrapping it up in a pretty package and marketing it to the ignorant masses.
But it’s that pretty little package that’s so great to me. I don’t mind paying extra for something to “just work”, which is why I like the closed platform. I don’t like Apple’s products because I’m simple or ignorant, I like them because life can be hard and since moving to Apple’s products, I’ve had many less headaches over computing products. And as a developer, being able to get into the unix side of things is a plus too.