Why Apple’s Distortion Field Works
When Steve Jobs recently made an appearance on Apple’s earnings call, he – to put it mildly – caused quite a stir. He said 7″ tablets like RIM’s Playbook and the Samsung Galaxy Tab will be DOA. He argued that the fragmented nature of Android is “a nightmare”.
Put in a more straightforward fashion, he smacked a lot of people down.
Yet, many rushed to smack him in return. RIM CEO Jim Balsillie suggested that people will soon tire of Apple telling them what to think. A Tweetdeck developer, whom Jobs referenced when talking about Android’s fragmentation, responded with bewilderment, saying that they have two developers working on their Android app and that it was fine. And good on them all. Jobs’ comments were, if nothing else, pretty arrogant.
But Jobs’ incendiary statements were also evidence of how the man thinks: my way may not be for everyone, but it’s the best way. And with Apple reporting an incredible $20 billion of revenue, it seems many agree.
So why is that that Steve Jobs and Apple in general command so much attention? And more to the point, why does this Apple “reality distortion field exist”?
What Is The Distortion Field?
Obviously, the Apple Reality Distortion field is not a real thing. But it is a useful term to describe a couple of interesting phenomena that surround Apple products:
- Apple the company seems to set the terms of debate in the tech world. Once the touch-screen arrived, it was touch-screen vs. keyboards. Closed vs. open debates are now about Apple vs. Google. Form vs. function arguments frequently reference Apple’s design. Apple is the company who have become a lightning rod for contemporary discussion about technology.
- Apple is perceived to be first to the market, even when it is not. Take something like Airplay. It, at least in theory, differs little from the DLNA wireless standard, but many blogs are calling it a gamechanger. Similarly, Steve Jobs called Facetime “the first video calling on a mobile device”, which it clearly isn’t.
- Users of Apple products fervently defend them against criticism.
So this is something we tech nerds know. But why does this happen?
Apple Has Become a Symbol
Nerds on the web (like us) often look at products in terms sheer functionality. I know I for one was pretty amazed when, on my Android phone, I could directly upload photos to Dropbox or simply install a new media player because I didn’t like the stock one. You can’t do this with Apple products, we claim.
But when people use examples like that as an example of why Apple ‘ain’t all that great’, what they miss is that Apple is not simply a tech company, but a cultural symbol. It isn’t necessarily about ‘sheeple’ or Apple’s marketing successes as much as much as it is that Apple, the media and the public have positioned Apple as a sign of the cultural importance and potential of technology.
For at least the last hundred years, technology has become the thing in our culture that is symbolic of how we’re moving into the future. And Apple has become the company many in our culture look to to determine the direction of that movement: what the trends will be, what technology will dominate etc.
How Apple Got There
So how is it that Apple became this symbol? Well first, it is not the only one. Google are there too, as are RIM, Sony and, even though people don’t realize it, Microsoft too.
But Apple seem to be the most prominent because of a simple, overlooked fact: its products are really obvious. You don’t have to be a tech-nerd to understand that touch screens are neat. You don’t have to be a geek to know that carrying around your music collection and scrolling through it quickly is useful. You don’t have to care about software to know that the way the App Store manages updates is really plain and clear. The benefits of Facetime are clear; no-one cares that you could do it on a Nokia phone years ago.
The point is that Apple’s grand sweeping statements (“we think this is the future of everything!”) connect with people quite easily. And because its products impact culture and not just tech – in things like the mobile web, the iPod, or the iPad – Apple can say what it wants because they are the ones setting the tone of the discussion. It is Apple who is showing everyone, rather than tech geeks, what technology is capable of and how it makes your life better.
What’s more, love them or hate them, Apple has innovated in creative, exciting ways. Whether touch-screens, iTunes, the App Store, the Macbook Air or the iPad, Apple is doing things before others. That’s key. It means that Steve Jobs can be an arrogant jerk because he can actually back it up.
So sure, the ‘reality distortion field’ can be annoying. Sometimes Apple will claim slightly crazy things – like open is bad, or that Android is terrible. Sometimes people forget that other companies are doing things that are just as exciting and innovative. But without understanding the reason for it – that Apple has become our culture’s symbol for how technology is supposed to work – it will never change, and we’ll be in Steve’s thrall for as long as he’s around.
Why does the writer of this article use the singular subject “Apple” and the plural verb “are” ???
Is that the way the write English in Canada?
British English commonly uses plural as this author did.
I completely understand your point of view, but the fact still remains that now Stevie is becoming so vulnerable from Google and others that he’s rampantly slamming them in public. He’s always been a cocky MF, but now he’s diving into details and identifying flaws in other systems. Well, the reality of the matter is, Apple products, regardless of their adoption rates, are losing ground to Android products. There are simply more Android powered devices that are coming to market with way more functionality than Apple can every catch up to. The release cycle of the products, regardless of who the innovator of the product is, is getting shorter and shorter by days as well. So by the time IPAD was announced, Samsung was made their announcements in parallel. Apple TV in my opinion is so weak compared to some of the competing devices, I don’t even know why Apple would even release that product.
In next 3-5 years, Apple is going to become what Microsoft is right now (stock prices and all — cash cow, but not innovator). They will have to take a back seat in technological framework and be a follower instead of leader. Because of they “closed” approach, they simply can’t innovate fast enough. Even if they “open” the system up because of the on coming threat, it’s TOO LATE!!!!
There are more android phones because they are available on nearly all carriers. In the states iphones only work on ATT. Just wait till verizon gets in next quarter.
Most people want a product they don’t have to worry or think about. That used to be IBM. PC’s had the most programs and tech people to go to when there were problems. Your work used them. Easy choice. Now, Apple has developed a reputation for quality and innovation. It may not be the absolute best at one particular thing, but I know before opening the box it will be innovative and easy to use. Is the HTC, Blackberry or Motorola better? One is better for this; the other for that. But Apple will be near the top in most everything and fun to use. I don’t have to think about it. It has earned trust…which translates to Billions. A trust Toyota used to have. Something as simple as giving us the most chips in a chocolate chip cookie (Chips Ahoy was a revolution-sadly). Walmart kept its promise for lowest prices. In a world where we have to fight from getting ripped off constantly…people get truly excited about a company that keeps its promise. Its a rare thing. The drive to increase margins by making crappier products is just too strong.
people are stupid sheep.. especially apple users.
“Apple are perceived to be first to the market, even when they are not. ”
“Whether touch-screens, iTunes, the App Store, the Macbook Air or the iPad, Apple are doing things before others.” Sort of contradictory, and I think THAT is what’s at the heart of the “Distortion Field”.
Apple claims to be, and IS frequently, “…perceived to be first…”, using touch screen and even multitouch as an example. Multitouch had been around for awhile, just not available on a consumer product. Take Facetime, also a concept that had been around for awhile, even ON consumer products, something highend cellphone users from other countries were quick to point out when Steve Jobs announced it, referencing phones like the Nokia mentioned in this article.
So the point REALLY isn’t whether Apple is innovating or not, it’s that they are PRODUCING. The problem is that everyday you read on the web about some new “magical” device all the tech sites are saying is going to be amazing, and it seems the majority of them never make it to market. Apple is in the business of keeping their business TO THEMSELVES, and then suddenly appearing at market with a device that puts many new technologies into a single – svelte – package and releases it with much fanfare. The result of this seems to be that people now TRUST that Apple is going to continue to impress them with “disruptive” new technologies in increasingly amazing designs. As I mentioned above though, this seems to primarily be the consequence not of innovating new technology, but rather being smart about bundling and reconciling other cutting edge technologies into an attractive package and not leaking things to the press years ahead of the release date.
In short I believe the distortion field is a result of very clever PR/Marketing and good design choices. Having said all that, I am disgusted by the effect of the distortion field and the cult of mac. When a product is good, celebrate that. When there are design flaws, OWN UP TO IT, FIX IT, and move on. Don’t worship the devices or the man.