Windows XP Still The Most Widespread Windows OS

Disclosure:
Some of the links in this article are affiliate links and we may earn a small commission if you make a purchase, which helps us to keep delivering quality content to you.
Meta is under intense scrutiny after newly unsealed court documents revealed internal discussions about using copyrighted content, including pirated books,…
Raise in the Subscription Cost Plans: According to the most recent reports of the company, Netflix subscription cost plans in…
Reports of Russia allegedly attempting to hack the whatsapp accounts that belong to government ministers and top-ranking officials across the…
Android recently unveiled their newest operating system, Android 6.0 Marshmallow. It doesn’t entirely overhaul the system, but it does bring…
Peter Bodifee
I am with Joe: the OS doesn’t matter to it’s user.
The stats shouldn’t be a suprise. And this is also not new.
http://www.itarchitecturecoach.com/2008/03/next-step-in-operating-systems.html
Michael Poczynek
Maybe Microsoft should focus on making a product realiable and building on a good solid foundation, rather then bringing out the next piece of unproven crapware.
Joe Power
I suspect a lot of people using Windows could not care less how pretty it is – they just want to get things done. The longer a relatively stable version of the OS sticks around, the more productive people can be because a) they become familiar with the landmines and learn how to tap dance around them and b) more developers gain a thorough enough understanding of that version to create really useful applications. Why do you think it was so hard to kill off DOS (which went relatively unchanged for over a decade)? I bet if you took a poll of all the people who chose the 64-bit version of Windows 7 (to have access to memory beyond the 3G limit) you would find a surprising number have a Virtualbox/VM Ware/some other virtualizer installation of XP on the same machine because 7’s compatibility features just don’t cut it. Heck, I even have DOSbox installed to run a few old games I enjoy.
Microsoft pushes new versions of Windows every few years because it needs the revenue stream – not because the new features actually increase user productivity all that much. Until they concentrate on what their users really want (well understood, stable platforms with good tools for putting together applications) people will have little incentive to switch.
If you were a touch typist, would you have any incentive to switch to a new keyboard layout every couple years just because the keyboard manufacturer claims it’s better?
JohnD
Can Windows 7 integrate into a Mac Open Directory environment? Nope! Can Windows XP? Yes.
Are users familiar with Windows XP? Yes? Windows 7? Nope.
Does Windows XP run nicely on a broad range of hardware without excessive driver difficulties for super expensive but older attached hardware (DVD imaging / medical systems etc). Yes. Windows 7. Hahah!
The one area I like Windows 7 for is the deployment of the integrated kernel (those doing auto / image deployments will know this is SO NICE). If they could backport that to XP, heaven!
AC
You’re welcome to think that way, but I must say it’s lazy logic. If you can use XP, you can use ANY Windows OS. From an IT standpoint, 7 is a godsend. Vista, not so much, but it was at least a great consumer OS. Given a strong enough system, nothing was wrong with it by SP1. I still would never deploy Vista in a network, too much horror from experience. Lessons learned!
XP is archaic and far less resilient that 7. Not to mention the fact that more API’s are leaving XP in the dust. DirectX 11, even in 10 in XP? Not happening. (officially… I know DX10 can be hacked into XP)
Finally, the main reason XP still dominates is because people really ride their computers till the end. As a repair tech, guess how old the average computer is? It’s usually 4-9 years old. And guess what they all run (and will continue to run)? X to the P.
kyle
It’s not “victim of it’s own circumstance.”
—
It’s “its own circumstance.”